By James Whittaker
Interesting conspiracy theory from Clay Smith in the Royal Gazette today. Apparantly the ICC and CricInfo are to blame for Bermuda’s failure to qualify for the World Cup… Really? I can’t think of any possible format the ICC could have contrived where Bermuda would have qualified by finishing fifth in a six-team group. And the decision to make the final two places in the Intercontinental Cup discretionary can, at this stage, only work in Bermuda’s favour.
And what does it really matter what CricInfo say? They did seem to enjoy Bermuda’s demise a little too much and the $11million men tag has, perhaps unjustly, seen us pegged as the team with ‘all the gear and no idea’. But, like it or not, that is the impression a lot of the other teams, press and officials out there in South Africa had of Bermuda – as a team who had not made the most of the opportunities afforded them.
It’s a perception reinforced by coach Gus Logie, who cited poor attendance at a training session with the world’s top fielding coach Mike Young, as one example.
Clay also cites four or five players who did perform well - not just David Hemp. It’s a fair point and one that we made in the Bermuda Sun in our report on the tournament. But you need more than a handful of players at the top of their game to excel and as an observer (and a supporter) of Bermuda at this tournament it is impossible for me to escape the notion that the other teams were fitter and more focused than us.
At the end of the day it doesn’t matter what I, Will Luke or the Royal Gazette might have to say about Bermuda’s performances and approach. It matters even less what we have to say about Scotland (and CricInfo has criticized them as well, though not as vehemently). The real analysis has to come from within. And unless the national team leadership, including Clay Smith – who may well turn out to be the next coach of Bermuda — are brutally honest about what went wrong in South Africa, then nothing will change.
Interesting conspiracy theory from Clay Smith in the Royal Gazette today. Apparantly the ICC and CricInfo are to blame for Bermuda’s failure to qualify for the World Cup… Really? I can’t think of any possible format the ICC could have contrived where Bermuda would have qualified by finishing fifth in a six-team group. And the decision to make the final two places in the Intercontinental Cup discretionary can, at this stage, only work in Bermuda’s favour.
And what does it really matter what CricInfo say? They did seem to enjoy Bermuda’s demise a little too much and the $11million men tag has, perhaps unjustly, seen us pegged as the team with ‘all the gear and no idea’. But, like it or not, that is the impression a lot of the other teams, press and officials out there in South Africa had of Bermuda – as a team who had not made the most of the opportunities afforded them.
It’s a perception reinforced by coach Gus Logie, who cited poor attendance at a training session with the world’s top fielding coach Mike Young, as one example.
Clay also cites four or five players who did perform well - not just David Hemp. It’s a fair point and one that we made in the Bermuda Sun in our report on the tournament. But you need more than a handful of players at the top of their game to excel and as an observer (and a supporter) of Bermuda at this tournament it is impossible for me to escape the notion that the other teams were fitter and more focused than us.
At the end of the day it doesn’t matter what I, Will Luke or the Royal Gazette might have to say about Bermuda’s performances and approach. It matters even less what we have to say about Scotland (and CricInfo has criticized them as well, though not as vehemently). The real analysis has to come from within. And unless the national team leadership, including Clay Smith – who may well turn out to be the next coach of Bermuda — are brutally honest about what went wrong in South Africa, then nothing will change.
Recent Comments